| |
|
 |
|

1) Events that:
- Steal time and production
- Add to cost
- Cause out of
control conditions
- Cause you to
deviate from plan
2) A Philosophy:
- Plan and invest in prevention and appraisal activities
- Eliminate and prevent process failures
- Solve recurring problems
3) The difference between optimum and actual
....performance.
4) The Results of
Problems
interfering with
....Performance.
Dollars related to
preventing problems.
- Scheduled Maintenance
- Road Maintenance
- Training
Dollars related to
what never
happened OR could have happened.
- Lost Production
or Sales
- Recovery losses
- Productivity Losses
(Operations and Maintenance)
Dollars related to events
that should not have happened.
- Unscheduled Maintenance
- Premature Tire Failures
- Excess Power Costs
- Excess Reagent costs

- It captures the
value of upside potential.
- It emphasizes the
cost of recurring problems.
-
It prioritizes what to fix first,
second
and third.
- It makes it
OK to discuss “what’s not working”.
- It
raises the urgency to fix problems that
have become
“part of the process”.
- It
involves employees in solutions to problems.
- It
changes a culture from being controlled
by problems to being “in control”.
|
Video on the value of lost opportunity
(6:42)
Click Here |
|
Audio on Creating Urgency with COQ
(1:20)
Click Here |
|
|
What Managers say about Cost of Quality…
Vice President / General
Manager, Copper Operation: “It has been made the primary
focus on monthly cost meetings. Managers have been made accountable
and performance evaluations include COQ as part of the expectations
here. Consistency is being achieved because key employees are coming
to recognize the value of taking advantage of lost opportunities.
By analyzing COQ data, we have come to realize that we were focused
on the wrong things. Without COQ, I believe some or most of the
improvements would have come at a slower pace.”
General Manager, Copper Operation:
“It has certainly helped us focus activity and energy where the
biggest gains can be made. We have known of opportunity in the fine
crushing area, but COQ helped the workforce and local supervision
pinpoint areas to fix. There has been a demonstrable improvement
in the area performance.”
Mine Manager: “We
have several areas where as a result of COQ information, we took
action and developed a remediation and measuring plan. We call these
plans cost of quality projects. Our department reports on these
projects routinely. Examples: haul truck tire cost, haul truck fuel
delay, and shovel cycle efficiencies. We report on the cost of not
having certain pieces of equipment available as planned. By doing
this, we have taken equipment availability and transformed it to
a cost that impacts our bottom line. Now the maintenance department
has a tangible cost number to work with in addition to availability.”
Tankhouse Superintendent:
“I think it has helped some people, hourly employees especially,
realize where the big ticket losses are. The concept of COQ has
really helped in this way.”
Mine Superintendent:
“I believe the focus on failure costs has definitely improved performance.
We have instituted shovel and drill optimization training, Mine
Dispatch training, better haul road maintenance and improved availability
by improving the scheduled vs. unscheduled ratios.”
Rod Plant Superintendent:
“We have been showing the employees at the rod plant the cost of
quality concerning the downtime and associated costs…The COQ program
is effective in that it makes you analyze issues in the operation
and forces you to impact their costs.”
Site Controller:
“It has re-focused attention on certain areas where “lost opportunity”
was happening. These opportunities do not reflect in operating cost
and this is an excellent way to keep focused.” |
|
Hidden Opportunities and Costs are like Pockets of Ore... ...To remove them, you must mine with the right tools!
Your entire tool box should be focused on opportunities – finding them, tracking them, and turning them into cash. This means being honest about “what’s not working”. Once opportunities are revealed, they should be valued. The best tool for valuation of opportunities is called ‘Cost of Quality’ *. Cost of Quality was developed about 50 years ago as a method to capture costs related to quality control. Companies using the “out of the box” version of Cost of Quality sometimes become discouraged because it does not integrate well with production processes. However…
…Cost of Quality* specifically modified for mining processes and equipment can be effectively used to reduce problems and enables operations, maintenance and support functions (marketing, sourcing, etc.) to improve the bottom line.* By using this version of Cost of Quality, employees can “Go Exploring” for opportunities that would be otherwise be overlooked and can rank the financial impact of those opportunities on the bottom line. These opportunities currently prevent your company from maximizing the performance of the current asset base. Employees that have accepted recurring problems as “part of the process” will begin seeing problems as opportunities. They will understand the cost of recurring problems and will solve problems will a new sense of urgency.
Cost of Quality can be used to:
- Avoid Expansion Capital.
- Reveal and Understand Plant and Value Stream Bottlenecks by setting process optimums based on a “perfect world” scenario.
- Proactively Manage Equipment Delays (Maintenance
and Operations).
o Drills, Shovels, Trucks
o Crushers, SAG and Ball Mills
o Furnaces, Anode Plant, Refinery Equipment, Tankhouse
- Quantify Productivity Losses using Optimum Operating Hours and Optimum Throughput Rates (not Budget)
- Maximize Metal Recovery
- Identify Excess Costs embedded in the General Ledger.
- Measure “What’s Not Working” to get focused on the
right things.
- Remove Non-Value-Added Costs and Process Inefficiencies.
- Value opportunities in RCM (FMECA)
How can COQ be applied to mining processes and equipment?
Here is a sample list of the types of events in the mining industry that can be valued and ranked using Cost of Quality:
- Loss of equipment availability and utilization
- Plan for maintenance or operating delays not followed
- Unplanned equipment delays (drills, shovels, trucks, mills, furnaces, tankhouse, longwalls, continuous miners, etc.)
- Product quality issues (downgraded material, recycle, contract penalties, etc.) – metals, coal, etc.
- Recovery losses
- All productivity losses for mobile and fixed plant equipment
- Out of control conditions in fixed plants
- “Surprises”
- 3rd party customer complaints
- Excess costs for product distribution
- Rework
- Stockpiles exceeding physical limits, resulting in shutdowns
- Overtime to make up for productivity losses
- Haul truck tire failures
- Excess power costs
- Excess reagent usage
- Belt failures
- Behind on waste removal
- Refractory brick wastage
- Lengthy fueling delays
- Shift Change over plan
- Over drilling or under drilling
- Excess Contractor Costs
- Labor costs related to firefighting
- Environmental spills
- Power failures
- Acts of God
- Business Interruption Insurance Claims
- Excess anode scrap
COQ Dollars also apply in support function departments (Maintenance, Marketing, Purchasing, Warehouse, Accounting, Environmental, etc.)
FAILURE COSTS
occur in all departments in a company. “Failure Costs” are dollars associated with processes not flowing as designed – delays and rework result.
Internal Failure Costs
- tied to processes connected to internal customers and processes within their own departments. These costs relate to productivity losses and excess costs incurred as the result of process failures.
External Failure Costs
– tied to third party customers. These costs are either lost sales, lost revenue due to poor quality, and excess costs incurred as the result of process failures.
When defining these costs, support groups should start with costs that impact their customers, especially Production. Production losses can be assigned to support groups if they are linked to unplanned downtime or constrained throughout.
|
|
Home
| About Us |
Client List/Testimonials | Contact Us |
Site Map | Links
Kay M. Sever, President
OptimiZ Consulting LLC
P. O. Box 337, Gilbert, AZ. USA 85299
Office: 480-545-9095, Cell: 480-223-2230
©2004 OptimiZ Consulting, LLC
Workshops |
Products | Prior Engagements/References
| Upcoming Events |
Mining Industry |
Other Industries
Support Functions |
Process Flows & Process Orientation |
Customized Tools to Drive Improvement
ISO-9001/Six Sigma Connections |
Identifying/Valuing Untapped Potential
| Cost of Quality |
Optimizing Processes
Proactive Equipment Delay Management
| Eliminating Bottlenecks & Avoiding Capital
Measuring Project Effectiveness |
Executing Action Plans |
Removing Barriers |
Changing the Way You Work
Connecting People to Performance |
Meeting Expectations
Search
Engine Optimization by Scoreboard Media Group
|